Here are two ways the Saints got a safety involved in pressure last season.
The Rush:
Safety Edge Rush
End & DT to the pressure working a twist. The DT is up the field penetrating the B Gap with the DE wrapping to the A gap.
The Away DE and DT are working a normal pass rush with the DE containing and the DT with a 2 way go on the Guard.
The Coverage:
Cover 1 man free. The Mike and Dime are both walked up into the A gaps. The Mike falls off on the snap to man cover the RB. The Dime runs out at the snap to replace the blitzing safety.
The pressure pattern is a common pressure pattern found in many defensive playbooks. What makes the pressure work is two factors: the Double A gap bluff look and the utilization of a Dime personnel.
The double A gap look forces the 5 OL and RB to be occupied with immediate rush treats. The Safety is not a primary threat and is less threatening in the look which allows his pressure to surprise the protection. With the blockers all focused on initial threats the pressure is home before the protection can identify who is actually rushing.
The Dime personnel allows the coverage to work. This look is possible from a nickel personnel. Asking a LB to run out to man coverage is a big task. Asking a Dime DB to run out to cover a #2 is both possible an effective from a Dime personnel.
The Rush:
DE's Contain
DT's A Gap Rush
Mike & Safety - B Gap Rush
The Coverage:
Cover Zero man coverage with the Safety hug rushing the RB. When the RB blocks the Safety adds to the rush.
The pressure pattern is again a common concept found in many defensive schemes. Most teams carry a standard Double ILB B gap pressure in a nickel personnel. However, the decision to use a Dime personnel instead again greatly increases the effect on the protection.
The usage of Dime f manipulates the protection. The offense declares the 4 DL and the Mike backer as the primary threats. This makes sense as those 5 are the closest to the LOS and most likely to pressure. The 2 Deep shell further reinforces the the OL's decision to handle those 5 threats as primary. The deep Safety blitzing is not an obvious rush threat which again allows him to catch the offense off guard.The hug rushing Safety occupies the RB by entering the rush. The result is an unblocked blitzing Safety in the B gap.
These are both creative ways to use Dime personnel to get greater productivity out of tried an true pressure concepts.
Monday, May 14, 2018
Saturday, May 5, 2018
Align to Win Part 2
What is the difference between personnel and spacing? As there is no universal football terminology, I'll start with how we define these terms.
Personnel is the people on the field. If we want to substitute a player into the game because that player has a skill set for the job at hand, we can do that with a personnel group change. Need an extra DB, sub one in with a new personnel group. Need your best pass rushing DL on the field, sub them in with a personnel group on 3rd & Obvious Pass downs. Bottom line Base personnel subs out for a specialized personnel group. Could be a a 1 for 1 sub or a mass substitution.
Spacing is how the defenders line up. Can a 3-4 personnel space like a 5-2, 5-3, 4-3, 4-2, or 3-3, yeah absolutely. Can a 4-2-5 with a hybrid player at DE morph into 3-4 concepts, definitely. As a defense, we are not bound in any way by the idea that personnel dictates spacing. If we have versititle players, specifically hybrid DB/LB or LB/DL we can play any number of spacings with the same personnel on the field.
Got a sub group of elite speed rushers, great, create a 3rd down specialized pass rush package and go sic 'em. But what if your best 11 are just that, your best 11. This is where spacing and align to win come together to help create specialized pass rush opportunites with base personnel.
Take a base 3rd down pass rush alignment. The DT's widen to work pass rush against the guards and the DE's are outside against the OT's. If the DE's are the best rushers and the guards are the weaker protectors it's possible the offense has exactly the matchups they want (G's vs DT's and OT's vs DE's).
With a simple call the defense can instead flip the DL alignments. This is still a 4 man front spacing with new roles for the DL.
Now the interior OL has to contend with the better rushers. The DT's soak up the better pass protectors on the outside. The DT's likely can align with width and keep contain. This alignment also lends itself to still running pass rush games.
Ultimately this stunt gets the DE back out to the outside.
Maybe the defense wants to attack a specific side of the protection. Again a front adjustment can help.
Nothing says the defense cannot align with both DE's on the same side. The DT's can contain and build a backstop opposite the Ends. The DE's can now work base pass rush or pass rush games and attack the weaker side of the protection.
Change the Spacing
Another option is to build an X rusher package. The idea is simple if you have a good rusher to sub you can sub for the X. If you don't you use your base 4 DL as the 3 down linemen and declare one as the X rusher. Who should be the X? Possibly the best rusher because the X can align anywhere and has good rush opportunities. Is is also possible to use the 2nd best rusher as the X. This allows a slightly lesser player to get and advantage in the rush and have the best chance to succeed. Meanwhile away from the stunting X can be the best rusher working in isolation.
Edge - X off the edge
Gilligan - Guard on an Island
Another option is to build a choice package for the X. For example:
Against sets with the RB set to the boundary or other drop back pass indicators the X calls Gilligan to the weakest OG.
But against sets with a threat of sprint out pass the X calls Edge to the sprint out threat. With a little planning the defense can be in a best rush situation with a simple set of weekly rules.
FRONTS
Take a base 3rd down pass rush alignment. The DT's widen to work pass rush against the guards and the DE's are outside against the OT's. If the DE's are the best rushers and the guards are the weaker protectors it's possible the offense has exactly the matchups they want (G's vs DT's and OT's vs DE's).
With a simple call the defense can instead flip the DL alignments. This is still a 4 man front spacing with new roles for the DL.
Now the interior OL has to contend with the better rushers. The DT's soak up the better pass protectors on the outside. The DT's likely can align with width and keep contain. This alignment also lends itself to still running pass rush games.
Ultimately this stunt gets the DE back out to the outside.
Maybe the defense wants to attack a specific side of the protection. Again a front adjustment can help.
Nothing says the defense cannot align with both DE's on the same side. The DT's can contain and build a backstop opposite the Ends. The DE's can now work base pass rush or pass rush games and attack the weaker side of the protection.
Change the Spacing
Another option is to build an X rusher package. The idea is simple if you have a good rusher to sub you can sub for the X. If you don't you use your base 4 DL as the 3 down linemen and declare one as the X rusher. Who should be the X? Possibly the best rusher because the X can align anywhere and has good rush opportunities. Is is also possible to use the 2nd best rusher as the X. This allows a slightly lesser player to get and advantage in the rush and have the best chance to succeed. Meanwhile away from the stunting X can be the best rusher working in isolation.
Edge - X off the edge
The X can align off the edge and rush like a OLB type pressure. The X makes an Edge Left or Edge Right call to declare where he is aligning and rushing. The front works away from the X's call.
The Nose and DE opposite can also work pass rush games to create good matchups opposite an edge call.
Gilligan - Guard on an Island
The X can walk up an isolate the Guard with a two way go. Again the Nose and End opposite the X can work base pass rush or a rush game. The X calls Gilligan Right/Left. From the same X on the guard alignment the X can work pass rush games with the End or the Nose.
Against sets with the RB set to the boundary or other drop back pass indicators the X calls Gilligan to the weakest OG.
But against sets with a threat of sprint out pass the X calls Edge to the sprint out threat. With a little planning the defense can be in a best rush situation with a simple set of weekly rules.
A defense can easily build multiple pass rush stunts by aligning the X rusher where ever the defense wants. The spacing choices are endless. X can line up as a Stack LB, 2 point or three point, stem around pre-snap, blitz into the rush, etc.
The X package can be a way to get great spacing multiplicity without subbing new personnel. The defense can easily use the X package to also build in various 5 man pressures and 6+ blitzes with the multiple spacing options of having the X rusher anywhere. When thinking about aligning to win, the defense has no rules about # on the LOS or structure of our alignments. Why does our best pass rush DE have to line up on an OT?
The X package can be a way to get great spacing multiplicity without subbing new personnel. The defense can easily use the X package to also build in various 5 man pressures and 6+ blitzes with the multiple spacing options of having the X rusher anywhere. When thinking about aligning to win, the defense has no rules about # on the LOS or structure of our alignments. Why does our best pass rush DE have to line up on an OT?
Friday, May 4, 2018
FAQ
Here are a couple questions I get a lot:
The most direct answer is frankly I wouldn't. I would focus on fundamentals of defense: block shed, pursuit, and tackling. I see all the time the quote "Culture beats Scheme" but it is just as true that "Fundamentals beat Scheme"! As for the scheme I would seek guidance from the Junior High/High School those youth kids will play in next about what to run to build the foundation for the next levels. Also I'm confident no youth team needs 4 from a side simulated blitz back stopped up by a double rotated zone coverage concept to manipulate the pass pro and QB read progression. Just saying.
Got more questions? Shoot me an email blitzologyblog@gmail.com or hit me up on twitter @blitzologyblog
Why study NFL defensive scheme when the pro game is so drastically
different from college/high school football? How much is really applicable? The main
reasons I look at NFL film:
Defending and aligning to multiple TE formations - The NFL
has basically every variation of 12, 13, 22, etc. going on in nearly every
formation possible. Being prepared for these types of heavy personnel groupings
is important. I’m always on the hunt to expand and improve our multiple TE
defensive calls in the playbook.
Unbalanced formations – NFL defenses see many unbalanced
formations from nearly every personnel. Having a good unbalanced plan is
important to avoid getting caught with limited answers to unbalanced.
Reduced splits – Many of the offensive formations in pro
football have reduction of splits. Defenses are forced to have answers for 2
man stacks, 3 man bunches, TE/wing structures, etc.
Motions & Shifts – NFL teams trade, shift, and motion
all over the place from every formation. Including shift & motion in heavy personnel
groups, to/from unbalanced, and into/ out of reduced splits.
Drop back pass protection – The NFL has every kind of pass
pro. 5, 6, 7, 8 man concepts with every adjustment possible in their arsenals. Also pro teams use
TE’s in the pass pro more often than college. TE in pass pro is a concept that is important to
study and understand in case we need more answers to attack it.
Creating pass rush opportunities - NFL teams are really good at attacking protection schemes. Pro defenses are also very good at creating 1 on 1 opportunities for their best rushers. Definitely good ideas to pull from for any defense.
Disguising Base Concepts - NFL teams do really well at disguising concepts they run all year long. Each week defenses spice it up with a new pre-snap presentations but still run a tried and true defensive concept. Studying one defense's full season of work in the offseason can be a big eye opener. Over 16+ games a defense may run the same blitz pattern multiple times but each week from a different pre-snap alignment or presentation. Really good ideas for getting more mileage from a defense's best calls are on display.
Simplicity works - Watch the Pete Carroll coaching tree. They play 1 high safety concepts and play them really well. They aren't trying to fool, they are trying to out execute.
Pro Players Screw Up Too - Pro players bust assignments, commit eye violations, and make all other kinds of mistakes.
Double Coverage – The NFL is full of hi/lo and in/out double
team concepts to cancel a star player or at least limit him. These concepts
apply at all levels. How do we take away their best guy?
#2 How would you apply this concepts on the Blitzology site to youth football?
The most direct answer is frankly I wouldn't. I would focus on fundamentals of defense: block shed, pursuit, and tackling. I see all the time the quote "Culture beats Scheme" but it is just as true that "Fundamentals beat Scheme"! As for the scheme I would seek guidance from the Junior High/High School those youth kids will play in next about what to run to build the foundation for the next levels. Also I'm confident no youth team needs 4 from a side simulated blitz back stopped up by a double rotated zone coverage concept to manipulate the pass pro and QB read progression. Just saying.
Got more questions? Shoot me an email blitzologyblog@gmail.com or hit me up on twitter @blitzologyblog
Don't worry more Align to Win is coming soon!
Labels:
FAQ
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)